DETAILED TESTING OF GRAFEX® SUPER [C-60] FULLERENES
To date, over 600 analyses and tests have been performed in a diverse grouping of private, government and university laboratories across the nation.
Our Research
Many of these include nano research labs that bring to bear highly sophisticated equipment and techniques for identification and verifying the properties, purity and structural features of the Grafex®Super [C-60] fullerene material.
Such characterization proceeded during a rapid advancement of the new and growing field of nano technology.
Grafex®Super [C-60] material has been described, by a number of researchers, as a very unique allotrope of carbon. Research and development efforts in the manufacturing, characterization and product application of this material have led to numerous intriguing discoveries.
Grafex® Super [C-60]’s high content of crystalline graphitic carbon phase has been verified in many different ways. Only a small sampling of those tests , dealing with supplemental rejuvenational health, safety, quality and consistency, are being presented on this website.
Equipping a University Laboratory with such rapidly changing instrumentation was so staggering in costs in the early days of Grafex®Super [C-60] that only a handful of Universities possessed even rudimentary equipment. Now, well over a hundred Laboratories across the nation have arisen and are growing with quite advanced/sophisticated equipment costing as much as $15,000,000 per Laboratory.
Some names of the equipment, testing tools and techniques utilized for identifying the various characteristics of Grafex® Super [C-60] fullerene molecules and the illuminating data therefrom are displayed below:
- Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)
- Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectrometer (EDS)
- Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)
- High Resolution Transmission Electron Microscopy (HRTEM)
- Gas chromatography
- Mass spectrometry
- Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) Atomic Emission Spect.
- Electron Diffraction (ED)
- Electro Magnetic Field Testing
- X-Ray Diffraction (XRD)
FE-SEM – Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy is used in visualizing overall structure of nanocarbon, including graphitic character. While TEM will provide higher resolution images, FE-SEM is generally more approachable and affordable.
SEM Image of Nano Sized (20-60 nm) Grafex® Material with Uniform Dimension
HR-TEM – High Resolution Transmission Electron Microscopy provides images of nanocarbon structures to 1 million times magnification, and sub nanometer resolution. TEM provides easy to interpret structural information, such as orientation of graphitic planes. TEM is used in with Raman spectroscopy and XRD as a method to show degree of graphitization, i.e. graphitic character.
GC – Gas chromatography is used in analytical chemistry for separating an analyzing compounds that can be vaporized without decomposition. Typical uses of GC include testing the purity of a particular substance, or separating the different components of a mixture.
The combination of Gas Chromatography(GC) and Mass Spectrometry(MS) is an invaluable tool in the identification of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) which are a group of over 100 different chemical molecules. Below is testing of the Grafex material by a commercial testing lab called Eurofins Test/America, to determine to what extent, if any, that the Grafex material may have PAHs.
Gas Chromatography(GC)
ICP-MS – Inductively Coupled Plasma Spectroscopy is an important method for analyzing residual inorganic constituents in nanocarbon, e.g., mineral residue, trace metals, and ionic contamination. The presence of inorganic materials can adversely impact the biomedical and electrical performance of nanocarbon materials. Below is testing of the Grafex material by Eurofins TestAmerica Labs.
Mass Spectrometry(MS)
The polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) listed above were the focus of a most rigorous and reproducible analysis by a certified laboratory, strictly following standardized testing protocols.
Definition Qualifier: As with most any sophisticated instrumentation, electronic detection of a signal is required against a baseline signal often characterized as electronic noise. In the above report, the background noise is insufficiently resolved from a true signal with most signals presented as undetectable (“U”) at the 1.5 ppm MDL (Method Detection Limit); the 4.4 & 3.6 ppm results for acenaphthalene and naphthalene respectively are presented with an “I” designation suggesting also poor distinction from background electronic noise and the laboratory practical quantification limit (limitations associated with the laboratory analytical sample preparation). Note: (The maximum U.S. government regulation limit on acenaphthalene in residential areas is 2400 ppm; the maximum limit on naphthalene in a residual area is 554 ppm).
Since its discovery at Rice University in 1985, C60 fullerene has been found to accompany the formation of soot that likewise often bears polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) of a generally perceived unhealthful nature or amount.
Accordingly, a lengthy list of PAHs provided in the above gc-ms analytical report were evaluated for presence in the Grafex® Super [C-60] by a highly reputable certified laboratory utilizing a most rigorous and reproducible procedure following well-established standardized testing protocols
Analysis by gc-ms involves the separation and resolution of the various PAH components utilizing a specialized capillary tube a third of a football field in length (30 meters). As each resolved component exits the gas chromatograph (gc) column or capillary tube, it is ionized via a mass spectrometric (ms) hookup and detected electronicall
So, all results are tied to an electronic signal in separable and indistinguishable beyond the electrical noise of the instrumentation and/or the reproducibility of analytical sample preparations according to the labels “U” and “I” explained by the testing company
Accordingly, no measurable PAH content in the nanocarbon material was detected in the low ppm limits of the analytical procedure. These results correspond with the CHN analysis also provided at this website from Micro-Analysis, Inc. where no hydrogen content was detected thereby likewise confirming that no PAH content is detectable.
Dr. Tom Bailey
Chief Scientist and Organic Chemist
ICP (Inductively Coupled Plasma)
Atomic Emission Spectroscopy
- Glow Discharge Mass Spectrometry (GDMS)